Smart people almost destroyed bitcoin. What happened since its inception is a masterclass of how they think and operate
Now they are so invested financially and reputationally that they will stay attached to their sinking boat no matter what
13EBPm…Noza
13EBPmUbnSUnuXQoPXFpxMxexxLJTaNoza
- 0 Following
- 0 Followers
- 609 Posts
Activity
BTC will work exactly as expected, you will still be able to HODL it.
Is Twetch sprouting?
$BSV is for those who wouldn't "exchange a walk-on part on the war for a lead role in a cage."
In Twetch, if you follow some idiot, you waste time AND money, so think twice.
Silver is not very shorted.
You have no clue about that, as about many other subjects you talk about but, as you profit from fear and suspicion, your comment is aligned with your business model
It was fun, congrats. Great performance and comments by the judges. And you managed to keep isaac's mouth under control, so kudos for that.
Wanna see a more dynamic version of that song.
IYKYK
Erik Vorhees is the king of broken syllogisms, take a look at his twitter account.
If people really gave one or two thoughts at the "inspirational phrases" they read on social media, the world would be better.
The mystery of how someone managed to make it at the right time to create the magical transaction remains. Do you have any clue on this?
Spending sats...
"Leader of the free world", do you see the irony?
Not for me, I am very calm. A well deserved "fuck you" is no sign of emotion.
Go ahead, make the poll.
Yes, life is great and many things will be alright.
Thanks, I was aware of the webpage, but had not made any research on the funds or the people.
"like a child" is another attempt to discredit my arguments using no logic, no facts, just "I am superior" bullshit. Social media people only care about building an audience, you are the AOC of twetch.
Fuck you, Emil.
Do you have any material on who are the investors on DCG?
OMG now ad hominem?
I follow you, I was trying to have a conversation. I am not a "central planner", c'mon. My sin was to ask for facts? I have not even advocated for the SEC. Disappointing. I thought you were a scholar.
What attitude? Making questions and seeking a fact-based discussion?
You are not willing to discuss, you are trying to discredit me.
I am unfollowing you, you tricked me with an intellectual pose, you are an emotional, attention-seeking lazy man.
Bye
Correct. Blockstream and Lightning Labs are both largely owned by MasterCard, Federal Reserve insiders and other finance magnates through DCG. They don’t want bitcoin disrupting their business models - hence the civil war we’ve quietly had.
It will require big central LTN hubs absorbing costs and grouping transactions, welcome to SWIFT 2.0. LTN is such a stupid idea for scaling.
It can work using the same models of todays financial system, but it is ripe for disruption at the moment of its birth.
Thanks for the warning, but please don't try to put words in my mouth. You are deviating so you can keep the conversation detached from facts.
The subject is if having an SEC is beneficial or not to society. If you don't want to discuss it, fine.
I am calling the top of bullish sentiment for $BTC being @elonmusk adding bitcoin to his bio.
Why was the SEC created?
Ok, I asked it wrongly. DO you know the facts that led to the SEC creation?
No I don't, but I know how to manage risk. From a systemic POV I don't know if they are good or bad. Do you think no systemic protection is the way to go? I would like to learn more about that, do you have some tip for what to read?
Working is good, don't worry. Having to work is not a problem.
So, what are some good names we can suggest to the BTC community when they can't use the name bitcoin anymore?