The battle for money is no longer at the "want or don't want CBDC" level, because it's going to come in anyway - a matter of what we choose. CBDC - the Digital Currency of the Central Bank (no matter which one) has been a hot topic for some time. The main dispute is between blockchain companies. Because CBDC without the blockchain will not function at all. And now on which blockchain they will launch the world economy. Blockchain should be viewed as the Internet 2.0 - every step forward of humanity has consequences, and in this case BANKS, GOVERNMENTS and PEOPLE jointly give up anonymity for transparency and privacy - which is not a bad thing if they choose BSV. If they fire CBDC on BTC or ETH - then governments (and it is not known who will be in power "tomorrow") will be able to continue to indebt us, i.e. enslave, corrupt and send money anonymously. Yes, we can then too - but do we really need to hide anything? A greater threat is, for example, setting up with a drug dealer for marijuana or secretly delivering weapons to, for example, the Islamic State? Easy. What you need to focus on is the distinction between privacy and anonymity. Behind anonymity there is cowardice, lack of fundamental strength - because someone who is sure of himself, is consistent and is not afraid of the truth - does not need to be anonymous.